From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1078 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: printf POSIX compliance Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:31:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20120611133125.GR163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <4FD5BC42.2090205@redhat.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339421759 26485 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2012 13:35:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:35:59 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1079-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Jun 11 15:35:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Se4mh-0007sz-Jo for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:35:55 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3759 invoked by uid 550); 11 Jun 2012 13:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3750 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2012 13:35:55 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD5BC42.2090205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1078 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:37:06AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > (Escuse me for breaking the threading, but I can't find the message's > ids from the mailing list archive.) No problem. Our mail archive sucks. > > Apr 19 17:43:04 wow, that gnulib thing is a lot more > > effort than I thought. Gotta send big thanks to palves for doing it. > > Apr 19 17:44:17 one reason we should maybe update gnulib > > more frequently is that if we wait too long, it is harder to do > > Apr 19 17:44:36 I had no idea when I started either :-P > > > > [... 5 hours later ...] > > > > Apr 19 22:45:35 yay, gnulib patch in, I can finally > > start my week's plan :-D > > Wow, way to pull things out of context to spread some silly FUD. First, you have > no idea what I had been up to those 5 hours, let alone if I was parked in > front of the computer the whole time... Then, the "patch" was really a I agree; pulling chat logs to make a point like this is at best impolite... Thanks for clarifying. Rich