From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1088
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: orc <orc@sibserver.ru>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: Vision for new platform
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:02:12 +0800
Message-ID: <20120612170212.35b56321@sibserver.ru>
References: <20120610225226.137363d0@sibserver.ru>
	<20120610151311.GH163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<20120610235125.31f38cd7@sibserver.ru>
	<20120610163359.GJ163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<20120611015349.701fa061@sibserver.ru>
	<CAPLrYET49bfBCeT2-jpZbFb5rNrbDB5dh-QwuX_66AccEU6Ptg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120611022606.303f6d07@sibserver.ru>
	<CAPLrYEQGNHdwdJyQ5=XY=G-4qyePUwAkHpzr1kxig_bscTv2-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120610193348.GK163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<20120611175922.34fea59b@newbook>
	<20120612014840.GT163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<20120612154646.78c592e6@sibserver.ru>
	<4f92293aea409aaad0f5504796980fb4@exys.org>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339491843 20298 80.91.229.3 (12 Jun 2012 09:04:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:04:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1089-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jun 12 11:04:02 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1089-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1089-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1SeN17-00067d-Gx
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:04:01 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 32223 invoked by uid 550); 12 Jun 2012 09:04:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 32195 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2012 09:03:57 -0000
In-Reply-To: <4f92293aea409aaad0f5504796980fb4@exys.org>
X-Mailer: claws-mail
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1088
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1088>

On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:44:25 +0200
aep <aep@exys.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:46:46 +0800, orc wrote:
> 
> > Daemon must not be overfeatured,
> > highly configurable and
> > controllable,
> > not control hardware
> > Init is critical process
> > Ideally init must not do anything than reap orphans/zombies,
> > starting shell scripts
> 
> 
> this is the specification of sysvinit.

What is your view of init boot process?