From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1156 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: perl 5.16 tests...is shm working right? Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:29:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20120617162952.GQ163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20120617072854.146e3b14@newbook> <20120617144451.GP163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120617090027.3125c8b9@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339950854 29565 80.91.229.3 (17 Jun 2012 16:34:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:34:14 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1157-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Jun 17 18:34:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SgIQR-0001JL-Pl for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:34:07 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 17440 invoked by uid 550); 17 Jun 2012 16:34:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 17432 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2012 16:34:07 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120617090027.3125c8b9@newbook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1156 Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:00:27AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:44:51 -0400 > Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:28:54AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > > hello, > > > I built perl 5.16.0 (defaults to ansi c89, but needs > > > SIG_BLOCK...used -D_GNU_SOURCE -std=gnu99, but _POSIX_C_SOURCE + > > > -std=c99 is probably enough) > > > Still using gcc-3.4 (with -Os) > > > > > > 10 tests failed, including both shm tests. > > > So I'm wondering if the shm support is fully working, or if that's > > > just > > > > For the record, this is legacy sysv shm, not modern POSIX shm. Are you > > on a 32- or 64-bit machine? I'm guessing some of the structures and > > padding might be messed up on 64-bit, although I thought we looked > > into and fixed that a while back. > Atom/32-bit x86. > I have only one computer out of 3 that supports 64-bit and it has 3 GB > RAM (until recently, 1 GB), so I haven't bothered trying 64-bit (partly > so I can share kernels and binaries, partly thanks to pointer bloat, > partly because I use dosemu with vm86 on them, and partly just > inertia). OK. Have you tried strace on the tests? Rich