From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1205 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl's ldd - don't exit immidately even if some libraries was not found Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:17:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20120620011736.GS163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20120620004210.07666644@sibserver.ru> <20120619175316.69baea9c@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340155307 2929 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2012 01:21:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:21:47 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1206-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jun 20 03:21:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sh9c9-00067o-5C for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:21:45 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 13973 invoked by uid 550); 20 Jun 2012 01:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 13965 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2012 01:21:44 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120619175316.69baea9c@newbook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1205 Archived-At: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:53:16PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:10 +0800 > orc wrote: > > > Patch to make ldd not to exit immidately after unsolved dependencies. > > Out of curiosity, > 1-what practical use is this, and > > 2-is there any other system that behaves the same? > > (well, I can think of HXRT with one environment variable set...but > that's Windows emulation for DOS, so I can see them having odd behavior) > > (Note, I'm not saying it's the wrong thing to do, just wondering where > you could use it without expecting SIGSEGV) My guess is that the practical use is to get a list of ALL missing library dependencies rather than just the first one. Rich