From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1249 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: orc Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: bug? sysinfo() and getopt_long() misbehavior Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 18:20:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20120701182023.3eb4f90f@sibserver.ru> References: <20120608005148.7d82c40b@sibserver.ru> <20120608031243.GG163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120608132731.042df3b2@sibserver.ru> <20120608201206.009e6c7d@sibserver.ru> <20120608141239.GK163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341138136 32197 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2012 10:22:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 10:22:16 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1250-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Jul 01 12:22:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SlHID-0005nY-LI for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 12:22:13 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 9480 invoked by uid 550); 1 Jul 2012 10:22:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 9466 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2012 10:22:11 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120608141239.GK163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: claws-mail Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1249 Archived-At: On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:12:39 -0400 Rich Felker wrote: > I believe it's a common but non-portable way of restarting option > scanning. Of course that would make no sense if this is the first scan > of options anyway. I'll try to look into what's going wrong here.. > > Rich What is the status of this issue? Tried to workaround it in iptables itself, but failed, too many logic around getopt_long plus it uses gnu extension that current getopt_long does not support.