From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1354 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: orc Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10] xattr syscalls Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:06:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20120725020602.017634c5@sibserver.ru> References: <20120722181332.191d4fa5@newbook> <20120722182148.3a2fb735@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343153318 9732 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2012 18:08:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:08:38 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1355-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jul 24 20:08:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1StjX1-0005le-4B for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:08:27 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 21898 invoked by uid 550); 24 Jul 2012 18:08:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 21871 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2012 18:08:21 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120722182148.3a2fb735@newbook> X-Mailer: claws-mail Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1354 Archived-At: On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:21:48 -0700 Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:13:32 -0700 > Isaac Dunham wrote: > > > This patch series is basically a reworked version of orc's previous > > patch. > > From what orc said, the first patch should provide enough to build > > Xorg; I haven't tested this yet. > > A few more patches are syscall wrappers (splice) or trivial > > functions (finite). > > Here's support for the xattr syscalls. orc probably knows better than > I what these are needed for... > > Isaac Dunham They were required by some gtk2 apps when I tested musl and gtk2 'direct' compatibility. It failed, syscalls remained. They were tagged in my patch as '// Why even libc needs them' comment, then I removed it and put into final patch just because someone can need it (as happened with Xorg).