From: Vasily Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: noexecstack
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:57:59 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120807115759.GA3713@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120806144521.565b32cc@sibserver.ru>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 14:45 +0800, orc wrote:
> - this (GNU_STACK) is binutils-specific (tinycc, for example, does not
> generate ELFs with that section, and future direction should be on
> that plain ELFs without any gnuish extensions IMO)
I haven't seen any specs for GNU_STACK, but it is used by Linux kernel,
so it is a de facto standard in Linux.
> - Kernel sets executable stack by default, kernel can be patched not to
> do that (that's one line patch per architecture)
This "default" is a case of absent GNU_STACK in the executable. This
case is fully handled in my patch. It will not be present in the
upstream kernel, though.
> - binutils can be patched to not produce ELFs with executable stack by
> default
As with kernel defaults, upstream binutils is WONTFIX. Use hardened
kernel/toolchain or set -z,noexecstack (the latter is better unless you
use nested functions or something).
Thanks,
--
Vasily Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-05 21:35 noexecstack Daniel Cegiełka
2012-08-05 21:41 ` noexecstack Anthony G. Basile
2012-08-05 21:46 ` noexecstack Rich Felker
2012-08-05 22:01 ` noexecstack Nathan McSween
2012-08-05 22:45 ` noexecstack Rich Felker
2012-08-06 6:43 ` noexecstack Szabolcs Nagy
2012-08-06 9:37 ` noexecstack Rich Felker
2012-08-06 11:19 ` noexecstack Szabolcs Nagy
2012-08-06 11:32 ` noexecstack Rich Felker
2012-08-06 21:11 ` noexecstack Kant
2012-10-03 15:54 ` noexecstack Rich Felker
2012-08-06 6:45 ` noexecstack orc
2012-08-06 7:16 ` noexecstack Daniel Cegiełka
2012-08-06 7:55 ` noexecstack Justin Cormack
2012-08-06 8:05 ` noexecstack orc
2012-08-06 8:46 ` noexecstack Daniel Cegiełka
2012-08-06 9:11 ` noexecstack orc
2012-08-06 9:15 ` noexecstack orc
2012-08-07 11:57 ` Vasily Kulikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120807115759.GA3713@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).