From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1481 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: orc Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: crypt* files in crypt directory Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:13:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20120809151332.5a8f36fe@sibserver.ru> References: <20120808022421.GE27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120808044235.GA22470@openwall.com> <20120808052844.GF27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120808062706.GA23135@openwall.com> <20120808214855.GL27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120809033613.GA24926@openwall.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344496528 25148 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2012 07:15:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 07:15:28 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1482-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 09 09:15:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SzMxs-00066f-3i for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:15:28 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1941 invoked by uid 550); 9 Aug 2012 07:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 1920 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2012 07:15:24 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120809033613.GA24926@openwall.com> X-Mailer: claws-mail Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1481 Archived-At: > Is use of GNU C extensions (also supported in clang) acceptable? I am > thinking of a "Labels as Values" trick to share more code. This would > make the source code less readable, though. > > Alexander They should be avoided (since the library is not targetting only gcc or clang compilers only).