Re: build musl with clang

[Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>]

* agent <agentprog@gmail.com> [2012-08-25 11:57:16 +0600]:
> that is stilled optimized for a plain malloc call even if i call
> not_called_malloc directly and not via a macro. to test the bug i
> used the following function:
> 
> void *foo(size_t n) {
> static char buf[200];
> return buf + 10;
> }
> 

don't define the function, just add a prototype

that's the use case we are trying to test
(clang does not know the definition of
malloc at the point it's used)

a defined function in the same translation unit
of course results different optimizations..