From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1824 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: C11 api coverage Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:22:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20120905062208.GR27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20120904203837.GX1104@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346825989 13472 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2012 06:19:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 06:19:49 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1825-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Sep 05 08:19:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T98xq-0001JA-9m for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:19:50 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 28007 invoked by uid 550); 5 Sep 2012 06:19:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 27998 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2012 06:19:46 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120904203837.GX1104@port70.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1824 Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:38:37PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > based on annex B (library summary) i created a diff > between the symbols of c99 and c11 to help the c11 > implementation effort once we get there > (format is [+-]symbol,prototype,header separated by tabs) > > the c11 api coverage table is linked from > wiki.musl-libc.org As I mentioned on IRC, the attached list includes symbols from Annex K, Redmond Troll Interfaces. At this time I'm really not interested in including/supporting them, and even if there did turn out to be a need for them at some point in the future, I think adding them would be a very different goal from adding regular C11 support. Rich