From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1838
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: capset() capget() syscalls
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:41:41 -0400
Message-ID: <20120906044141.GA46104@intma.in>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1208271348180.19990@s1.palsenberg.com>
 <20120905061905.GQ27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <50471B56.8040804@palsenberg.com>
 <20120905142441.GT27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAK4o1WzWsdGqsvuy5J1kg1=WzeG_yM7-PPbx+1x4yX3XgwKCXA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120906030406.GY27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <5048141C.5030503@barfooze.de>
 <20120906032013.GA27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20120906032811.GA45295@intma.in>
 <20120906034146.GB27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346906515 9239 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2012 04:41:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 04:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1839-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Sep 06 06:41:57 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1839-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1839-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1T9Tue-0007Wt-Nq
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:41:56 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 21990 invoked by uid 550); 6 Sep 2012 04:41:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 21982 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2012 04:41:53 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120906034146.GB27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1838
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1838>

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:41:46PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> 
> Alternatively, if the kernel and glibc folks could agree (or at least
> the glibc folks), we could develop a new sane API for exposing
> capabilities from libc instead of with a third-party library.
> 

I don't think that's a likely event.  I certainly hope musl feature
decisions don't block on awaiting rational behaviour from the glibc
camp, in particular.  I just don't like the idea of shoving that
single-kernel mess into a libc.