From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1864 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Time for an issue tracker? Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:54:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20120907095432.32163730@newbook> References: <20120907083532.566bd927@gmail.com> <20120907134713.GO27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347036887 12751 80.91.229.3 (7 Sep 2012 16:54:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:54:47 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1865-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Sep 07 18:54:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TA1pR-0008My-DM for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:54:49 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5198 invoked by uid 550); 7 Sep 2012 16:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 5189 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2012 16:54:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=E2KSnHLXIu+gdTnLT4eafrRBQsG43rmtHIaFeyp2V6nem4wB7KQ5Dh5l0O/YRWC0nf8FGWtWsr3QoZ+cYa+LhKYJvm1cuvCZUdmXO8Cy7IqB0tFLZJIE23PheALlZHlCIK3K4tUcmTQ5jtJCUD1+Q9vehX2xMrD5if2wiJ5zI9M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <20120907134713.GO27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1864 Archived-At: On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:47:13 -0400 Rich Felker wrote: > It would help if sh4rm4 would use the list... :) This patch has been > in the works and under discussion for about a week on IRC, but got > little/no attention on the mailing list. Patches on IRC rather suck for discussion: -no permanent record of suggestions (you have to be there/have a bot logging the channel...which is not possible with an ephemeral connection like I have.) -no public record -render inline comments impractical That said, IRC is great when you're asking about _revising_ a patch. > I'd like to have an issue tracker too. My preference is always one > where you can do most of the work by email if you prefer, but nowadays > I don't mind using the web interface either. I'm not sure how other > contributors feel about this, but I suspect we have some who won't > bother with the issue tracker unless they can use it comfortably via > email and/or a text-based web browser... :-) The way Debian's bug tracker works? or different? And yes, you're right on the last count. The most feature-rich browser I've gotten working on musl is dillo, but I prefer to just start links. I'm a lot more likely to report issues while I'm running muslin than under Ubuntu. ;) Isaac Dunham