From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1877 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kurt H Maier Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: documenting musl Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 07:48:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20120908114828.GA67571@intma.in> References: <20120908024006.GA5937@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120907233658.2eb8ee1a@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347104922 5925 80.91.229.3 (8 Sep 2012 11:48:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:48:42 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1878-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Sep 08 13:48:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TAJWm-0005nO-K6 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:48:44 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18040 invoked by uid 550); 8 Sep 2012 11:48:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 18032 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2012 11:48:40 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1877 Archived-At: On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > btw. documentation - mandoc is a better option than (old/big/ugly) > groff for documentation. None of those links explain why they seem to think it's either groff or roll-your-own, when there are plenty of lightweight roff implementations. Any hints?