From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1880
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: documenting musl
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:47:23 -0400
Message-ID: <20120908124723.GA68331@intma.in>
References: <20120908024006.GA5937@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20120907233658.2eb8ee1a@newbook>
 <CAPLrYERh6-8__Ujjkj1R4RTq72OnKqczOHG44ADew6f+ACBLxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120908114828.GA67571@intma.in>
 <CAPLrYETBXXOb7VpucBApU=ih0wK=x5DUR6RMAc0=fGQQrOLfbw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347108459 30547 80.91.229.3 (8 Sep 2012 12:47:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:47:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1881-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Sep 08 14:47:41 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1881-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1881-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TAKRm-0006Pn-Ue
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 14:47:39 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 7798 invoked by uid 550); 8 Sep 2012 12:47:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 7790 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2012 12:47:35 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPLrYETBXXOb7VpucBApU=ih0wK=x5DUR6RMAc0=fGQQrOLfbw@mail.gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1880
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1880>

On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 02:35:22PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> 2012/9/8 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>:
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> >> btw. documentation - mandoc is a better option than (old/big/ugly)
> >> groff for documentation.
> >
> > None of those links explain why they seem to think it's either groff or
> > roll-your-own, when there are plenty of lightweight roff
> > implementations.  Any hints?
> 
> hmm... mandoc isn't lightweight? :)
> 
<snip>
> 
> compared to groff (gentoo):
>
<snip>
> 
> Daniel

Now you're doing it. There are dozens of other roff implementations,
such as the one that comes with 9base, or the heirloom doctools, etc.
Why does everyone who uses mandoc ignore everything but groff?