From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1984
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: apache working (sort of)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:10:46 -0400
Message-ID: <20120922201046.GW254@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1209222004250.12327@laas.mine.nu>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348345173 16929 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2012 20:19:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:19:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1985-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Sep 22 22:19:33 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1985-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1985-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TFWAm-0000LN-97
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:19:32 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 11824 invoked by uid 550); 22 Sep 2012 20:19:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11816 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2012 20:19:27 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1209222004250.12327@laas.mine.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1984
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1984>

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 08:08:46PM +0200, Jens wrote:
> 
> Just got a working apache musl build.
> Well its minimally tested so far.. but it runs and displays "It
> works". :-)
> 
> The one problem was that apr looks up the service named "0".
> So I had to add a service named "0" to /etc/services.

This should not be necessary. I think the bug is that when "0" is
parsed as a number and the result is 0, getaddrinfo is treating this
as a parse error (since I expected "0" would never actually be used)
and rejecting it instead of just using the value 0.

I'll take a look and get it fixed properly.

Rich