From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2295 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Remaining agenda for 0.9.8 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:02:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20121116070226.01d5bab0.idunham@lavabit.com> References: <20121115015500.GA2878@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20121115225912.4340a2d2.idunham@lavabit.com> <20121116071135.GO20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353078163 30106 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2012 15:02:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:02:43 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2296-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Nov 16 16:02:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TZNRS-0004ug-4q for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:02:50 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 28310 invoked by uid 550); 16 Nov 2012 15:02:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 28302 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2012 15:02:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=DkxxnOqt+YEu0SW7woJOoQxpsTn8cOLbDkyILSSi35MmxeFvRILvqyAabXx8PJJ5RR66+5D2+R+Ss8P1NcD87R45voEY0wusZkHFtNb58ljOWrFoyl9UOL09DxTy55nix6iHa8J9jgAzveAo9Zlv1ofOJBbbt6tnW5B9GRjTnxg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <20121116071135.GO20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2295 Archived-At: On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:11:35 -0500 Rich Felker wrote: > > For releases that do need more testing, what would you think of rc > > tarballs? While git can be built with only libc as a dependency* > > (NO_PYTHON=1 NO_PERL=1 MSGFMT=true... if I remember right), "pull > > from git" does still limit your audience. > > The old gitweb had a "download tarball" link. I don't think cgit has BTW, I hope you've updated cgit recently: there's a command execution bug that was recently fixed (as well as another security issue). > that (for which my server is thankful). RC's are one idea, but I > wonder if daily snapshots might be just as good. Possibly, especially with "just after release" fixes. -- Isaac Dunham