Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.7?]

[Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:13:08PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> > Breakdown: 
> > https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q3-98b82c29f04c-musl-0.9.7-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1 
> > or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
> > Archive: 
> > https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q3-98b82c29f04c-musl-0.9.7.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1
> > 
> > 
> > Notes:
> > 
> > In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means 
> > tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.
> 
> OK, I see that apache doesn't build...sabotage has patches for that.
> OpenMotif and mpg123 should be easy fixes (they built without
> patching a while back); I expect it's just CFLAGS. gnutls, Qt 3 & 4,
> m17n-db, and libcanberra are the most valuable dependencies.
> Heirloom-libcommon looks pretty important, but that's thanks to how
> pkgsrc treats the heirloom toolchest.
> 
> libusb should use the same patch as libusbx; I actually followed
> something on "How to build libusb for android" when I did that.
> 
> It's claiming that the Gimp doesn't build-is that correct?
> 
> I wonder what's blocking libdrm...

I haven't had a chance to do any analysis of the results myself or
even give them a serious look. If you can figure out some of the
causes of failure and if any of them are things that would be easy to
fix, I might be able to get some fixes in before the 0.9.8 release.

Rich