From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2391 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [musl] Support for musl libc in OpenWrt Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:15:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20121201041514.GF20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <50AFD839.9010408@openwrt.org> <20121123221533.eb6d941c.idunham@lavabit.com> <201211251246.27100.florian@openwrt.org> <20121125133733.GF10895@port70.net> <50B26644.30401@barfooze.de> <50B2719E.9080004@openwrt.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354335327 3580 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2012 04:15:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 04:15:27 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2392-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Dec 01 05:15:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TeeUM-0001sK-Gy for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 05:15:38 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 25687 invoked by uid 550); 1 Dec 2012 04:15:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 25679 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2012 04:15:26 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B2719E.9080004@openwrt.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2391 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 08:29:34PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 25/11/2012 19:41, John Spencer a écrit : > >On 11/25/2012 02:37 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > >>* Florian Fainelli [2012-11-25 12:46:26 +0100]: > >>>Cop1 registers. After patching setjmp not to access these it works > >>>flawlessly > >>>on MIPS (big-endian) but MIPS (little-endian) still segfaults while > >>>being > >>>executed either from the kernel or qemu-mipsel. > >>> > >>so there is endian issue with dynamic linking > > > >nope, mipsel works as fine as mipseb using sabotage. > >there must be something wrong on the openwrt side. > > Ok, then I will just start with more vanilla toolchains and kernel > and see what could be going wrong. Thanks! Any progress on this? Rich