From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2514 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: STLport Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:07:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20121231030745.GL20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20121231020607.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1716568.15394.1356922853329.JavaMail.root@grantgray.id.au> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356923283 8778 80.91.229.3 (31 Dec 2012 03:08:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:08:03 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2515-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Dec 31 04:08:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TpVjY-00053A-6O for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:08:12 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 26107 invoked by uid 550); 31 Dec 2012 03:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 26094 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2012 03:07:57 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1716568.15394.1356922853329.JavaMail.root@grantgray.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2514 Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:00:53PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote: > Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft > code, which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but > I have no allegiance to STLport so will look into it. I think libc++ would be a much better choice. Even if it ends up being more work, it's actually modern/up-to-date and it's a library everybody wants to support anyway. And it purportedly aims to be portable (not sure if this is really true), so it shouldn't be so bad to get it working with musl. > Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl? I know several people have experimented with using llvm/clang with musl, but I don't know what the status on libc++ is. Rich