From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2529 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Agenda for next release? Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:51:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20130101045107.GQ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20121231191131.GA18334@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1357013172.31232.29@driftwood> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357015881 14042 80.91.229.3 (1 Jan 2013 04:51:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 04:51:21 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2530-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jan 01 05:51:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tptp9-0002fR-KG for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:51:35 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 32097 invoked by uid 550); 1 Jan 2013 04:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32089 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2013 04:51:20 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1357013172.31232.29@driftwood> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2529 Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:06:12PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On 12/31/2012 01:11:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >Another port (perhaps x32, like originally proposed) is also > >definitely an option if anybody's up for doing it. I had considered > >doing it myself in this release cycle, but I'm a bit busy with some > >other projects for at least a couple weeks so I'd rather not get > >bogged down in a big time-eater right away, and instead spend my time > >with musl on small isolated feature additions and bug fixes. > > > >Anything else I missed? > > From my point of view sh4, sparc32 support are interesting because > switching aboriginal to musl would either have to drop support for > those two platforms or support two libcs in parallel. (m68k and > s390x are of secondary interest becauase those are the platforms > I've been trying to add. In theory mips64 is currently supported but > in practice it's deeply flaky at the kernel and possibly qemu level; > not widely used.) > > Not priorities, just thought I'd chip in... Thanks! And good to see you again! I'd be interested in seeing these ports too, but like I said above now is not the best time for me to start doing a new port myself. So unless somebody else wants to try a shot at it, these will probably have to wait a bit. Rich