From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2635 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Make bits/wchar.h correct for all architectures (bug 15036) (fwd) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:25:59 -0800 Message-ID: <20130119112559.626f5e11.idunham@lavabit.com> References: <20130119011133.GL20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358623575 7564 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2013 19:26:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:26:15 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2636-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jan 19 20:26:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Twe3j-0008AZ-NS for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:26:31 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 22026 invoked by uid 550); 19 Jan 2013 19:26:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 22018 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2013 19:26:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=dI7/CtOrpvu6Q9R8bSEtQZm6Gd9CvsKxnD4edylw9NhoJ6/vnniI0hWwY1uEtcIt3xaO1mJrYYj8gfVvRjqO65/X5nUIyHOvTUkDcO07y6T089MOSx7K1gJQ51F2VCpcmlzR/AUstjfw6YCdQNd+9wr85KSqBdbsI7MjC50/3xA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2635 Archived-At: On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 08:58:40 -0500 Strake wrote: > > On 18/01/2013, Rich Felker wrote: > > I think the same issues apply to musl, and the solution seems very > > elegant. Maybe we can apply the same thing. What do you think? > > What if int is not 32-bit? Not possible on a (current) POSIX system, to the best of my knowledge. Also not compatible with any glibc or LSB abi, or any Linux port. In other words: Unless you're planning to port musl to ELKS or Win16/Win64, you're joking. And I would venture to say that you would be joking in those cases, too. -- Isaac Dunham