From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2644 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: dladdr() Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20130122130730.GB10600@port70.net> References: <20130115184820.GA20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1358334018.2170.23.camel@6-core> <20130116125119.GA27914@port70.net> <50F6B818.1070807@gmail.com> <20130116164943.GD20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <50F6E698.3070604@gmail.com> <20130121020335.GO20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1358751500.2196.20.camel@6-core> <20130121183523.GP20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1358836066.2172.45.camel@6-core> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358860066 13655 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2013 13:07:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:07:46 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com, pierre@silentlife.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2645-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jan 22 14:08:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Txda6-0002mI-0q for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:08:02 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 29854 invoked by uid 550); 22 Jan 2013 13:07:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 29846 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2013 13:07:43 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358836066.2172.45.camel@6-core> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2644 Archived-At: * pierre [2013-01-22 07:27:46 +0100]: > The information I wanted you guys to have is that, > for the same application code, both GLIBC and musl > compiled in DEBUG mode do not crash (while musl in > release mode crashes). ... > at doing that - I was merely providing the information > I had available when you asked "does it work for you?". i'd assume you invoke ub somewhere (and i think that's what dalias was trying to say) but it is desirable to verify that this is really not a musl bug and we need better info for that: instead of 'debug mode' vs 'release mode' the config.mak with compiler flags/architecture/.. for the two cases instead of 'crash' the details of the caught signal, backtrace, memory map etc a link to the source code or a minimal example can help too i'm not sure how populating backtrace with dladdr works, sounds suspicious, how do you get your backtrace?