From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2696
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: ARM unwind issue
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:55:20 -0500
Message-ID: <20130129235520.GK20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <CAPfzE3a0BaJmpx2tXD+2B57RHTFh6qHtCgKUSYxj1ERUx+qyeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130128210355.ca8cbd88.idunham@lavabit.com>
 <CAPfzE3Zzexi8n534g-pCwoKUdcKvJ9KbQ6QEquhQdYZMTgkdtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359503733 14590 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2013 23:55:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2697-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jan 30 00:55:53 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-2697-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2697-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1U0L1s-0003jR-4F
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:55:52 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 26279 invoked by uid 550); 29 Jan 2013 23:55:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 26271 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2013 23:55:33 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPfzE3Zzexi8n534g-pCwoKUdcKvJ9KbQ6QEquhQdYZMTgkdtQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2696
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2696>

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:56:27AM +1300, Andre Renaud wrote:
> > 2: I guess you're manually duplicating
> > REALGCC=/tools/arm/arm-2010q1/bin/gcc musl-gcc program.c -o program.o
> I actually wasn't using musl-gcc, I was manually adding the '-spec' line.
> 
> It turns out that the root cause was a mistake on my behalf when
> configuring musl, which resulted in LIBCC not being set properly in
> config.mak.

Yes, that would do it. BTW, note that musl is _not_ using libgcc_eh
for anything itself. The need for libgcc_eh is due to libgcc having
unwanted dependencies on it, and musl needing those parts of libgcc.

Rich