From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2758
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: printf warning with uintmax_t
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 17:14:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20130208221408.GN20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <1360361439.23424.95.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360361660 3196 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2013 22:14:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Feb 08 23:14:41 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-2759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1U3wDP-0003jX-JU
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:14:39 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 32467 invoked by uid 550); 8 Feb 2013 22:14:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 32459 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2013 22:14:20 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1360361439.23424.95.camel@eris.loria.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2758
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2758>

On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:10:39PM +0100, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> Hi again,
> with musl-gcc the following test program produces a bogus warning
> concerning uintmax_t on my machine (ubuntu amd64)
> 
> Jens
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> 
> void toto(void) {
>   uintmax_t val = 42;
>   printf("%jX\n", val);
> }

It looks like we're not matching the ABI convention gcc expects, where
[u]intmax_t is the lowest-rank type capable of storing the full
integer range (i.e. long on 64-bit systems).

This should probably be fixed, if for no other reason than C++ ABI
issues.

Any objections?

Rich