From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2791 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Have different definitions of __pthread_tsd_main agree in size Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:49:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20130211214921.GU20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20130211120816.GC6181@port70.net> <1360587084.9132.83.camel@eris.loria.fr> <20130211130906.GE6181@port70.net> <1360589888.9132.104.camel@eris.loria.fr> <20130211134454.GR20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1360591648.9132.117.camel@eris.loria.fr> <20130211143944.GF6181@port70.net> <1360600223.9132.185.camel@eris.loria.fr> <20130211170839.GG6181@port70.net> <1360603314.9132.202.camel@eris.loria.fr> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360619382 22047 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2013 21:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:49:42 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2792-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Feb 11 22:50:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U51G4-0006NV-OZ for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:49:52 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 15847 invoked by uid 550); 11 Feb 2013 21:49:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 15839 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2013 21:49:33 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1360603314.9132.202.camel@eris.loria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2791 Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:21:54PM +0100, Jens Gustedt wrote: > Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 18:08 +0100 schrieb Szabolcs Nagy: > > btw system uses environ but internal/libc.h defines environ > > to be __environ, i think that's hideous > > Yes, I had seen that, my second version of the patch addresses that, > too. Perhaps one should also remove the define from internal/libc.h ? I agree that's hideous and should be removed. Rich