From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2884 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kurt H Maier Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl vs. Debian policy Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:45:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20130307184554.GA84150@intma.in> References: <20130306152913.59b2e776.idunham@lavabit.com> <20130307130424.GW20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87r4jr6pm3.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362681969 24201 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2013 18:46:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:46:09 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2885-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Mar 07 19:46:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDfpl-0001WO-30 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:46:29 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 17726 invoked by uid 550); 7 Mar 2013 18:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 17718 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2013 18:46:06 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4jr6pm3.fsf@gmail.com> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2884 Archived-At: I understand the need to play nice with everyone, but the idea of changing musl's build scripts to satisfy glibc-based desires strikes me as incongruous with the idea of an independent libc project. Debian packagers should be able to make whatever changes they need in their packaging scripts. I'm quite certain it's possible. khm