From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2893 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kurt H Maier Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl vs. Debian policy Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 20:09:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20130308010918.GA21361@intma.in> References: <20130306152913.59b2e776.idunham@lavabit.com> <1362695430.6812.8@driftwood> <20130307162206.f5cc2136.idunham@lavabit.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362704966 8407 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 01:09:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 01:09:26 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2894-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Mar 08 02:09:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDloj-0002TY-TM for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:09:50 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 21538 invoked by uid 550); 8 Mar 2013 01:09:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 21530 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2013 01:09:27 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130307162206.f5cc2136.idunham@lavabit.com> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2893 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:22:06PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > It's quite possible; the issue is whether we'd end up "encouraging" them to package musl in a way that guarantees incompatability with everyone else. If they install the x86_64 version as > "/lib/ld-musl-amd64-el.so.1" > (what dpkg-architecture might encourage if debian/rules installs libc.so itself), then musl on Debian amd64 would be incompatible with musl elsewhere. Then their packaging policies have failed. This is still a Debian problem and not a musl problem. khm