From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3016
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: #define __MUSL__ in features.h
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:42:17 -0400
Message-ID: <20130331014217.GG20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <CAPLrYERwUJD8Q=iFJHj=Q+Xvpf_Axqu-FdOa-h5_ZfV-jmEfYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130329210047.GF20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAFipMOHKFkKhFhvCpLwEaWL6zzU4qCcjs+Zb8fmPrySKa0WPZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL3m8eDexUatTd7tuD=WLigYVODhYHqWLbgcH3LNd26MW7QYFA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364694149 27651 80.91.229.3 (31 Mar 2013 01:42:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:42:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3017-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Mar 31 03:42:56 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3017-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3017-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UM7IN-0008DE-H9
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 03:42:55 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1907 invoked by uid 550); 31 Mar 2013 01:42:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 1893 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2013 01:42:30 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL3m8eDexUatTd7tuD=WLigYVODhYHqWLbgcH3LNd26MW7QYFA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3016
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3016>

On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 02:16:48PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> wrote:
> > no, this should be fixed by openssl using
> > their huge configuration script correctly,
> > ie. detecting what is available instead of
> > using wrong ifdefs
> >
> > their assumptions about termios is broken,
> > adding more ifdefs would just make it worse
> > (note that termios.h is specified by posix
> > so even if they want to use ifdefs, that
> > should be the fallback on a posix system)
> 
> Yes, in my experience, openssl is grievous to build, and I can't
> remember all what perversions I wrought to do so, but both -DTERMIOS
> and -DTERMIO are in Configure, so it may well be at fault.

Indeed, using termio (without the s) at all is _wrong_ unless you're
on a horribly outdated legacy system. The default should always be
termios and termio should only be used on systems that are detected or
known to be lacking termios.

Rich