From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3062 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Building libc separately from libm,librt,libpthread and others Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 18:21:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20130407162109.GU30576@port70.net> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365351680 20768 80.91.229.3 (7 Apr 2013 16:21:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:21:20 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3066-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Apr 07 18:21:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOsLK-0003D7-82 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:21:22 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 27972 invoked by uid 550); 7 Apr 2013 16:21:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 27963 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2013 16:21:21 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3062 Archived-At: * Timerlan Moldobaev [2013-04-07 17:43:11 +0300]: > Whereas the comparison table located in > http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html > claims the size of complete .a set as 333k, I got around 2M while building > the library on x86_64 with gcc version 4.1.1. btw the comparision was made on i386 and 32bit vs 64bit can make a big difference i just checked here and libc.a is 1.4M but the real size of the object code is 338K using size libc.a |awk '{s+=$4}END{print s/1024}' (i386, gcc 4.8)