From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3155 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: cluts test suite with musl Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:40:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20130423134038.GX20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366724457 25509 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2013 13:40:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:40:57 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3159-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Apr 23 15:40:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UUdSn-0006qi-AR for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:40:53 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5160 invoked by uid 550); 23 Apr 2013 13:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 5152 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2013 13:40:51 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3155 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:26:51PM +0300, Timerlan Moldobaev wrote: > Hi , > > I am trying to run cluts test suite from > https://github.com/lmarcetic/cluts over > the latest musl libraries. > Seems that this test suite is not synchronized with musl as I am > getting numerous errors. > Is this test suite operational ? > Is it a part of musl correct functionality checking ? > Can you look at potential issues in musl discovered as a result of cluts > tests running ? I know we don't use all of cluts because some of the tests are wrong, and it has some bitrot. Maybe somebody could look into this and making an updated version that's correct or at least has the incorrect tests disabled? I'll look at it when I have enough time to spend on it. Rich