From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3175 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kurt H Maier Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries? Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:48:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20130424114852.GA99797@intma.in> References: <1366683267.18069.155@driftwood> <5176FE83.3010301@gentoo.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366804141 9857 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2013 11:49:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:49:01 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3179-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Apr 24 13:49:05 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UUyC9-0007HF-6A for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:49:05 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7400 invoked by uid 550); 24 Apr 2013 11:49:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7390 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2013 11:49:04 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3175 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > > btw. has anyone used go with musl? > Go ships its own libc, which I'm fairly certain it depends on. It's also not suitable as a system programming language and they dropped that claim from their propaganda some time ago. khm