From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3183
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries?
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:38:20 -0400
Message-ID: <20130424133820.GF20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <1366683267.18069.155@driftwood>
 <5176FE83.3010301@gentoo.org>
 <CAPLrYET=ObrdY6r+o7Mpqrony=7X4JTGuY7bWRYTTRBL9UT_mQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130424114852.GA99797@intma.in>
 <CAPLrYERfjEtXhUWGWJjp4rWvh2iCV-GaaNniaub386hUWSb5Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366810713 21317 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2013 13:38:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3187-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Apr 24 15:38:37 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3187-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3187-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UUzu5-0001Od-QR
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:38:34 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 4022 invoked by uid 550); 24 Apr 2013 13:38:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 4007 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2013 13:38:32 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPLrYERfjEtXhUWGWJjp4rWvh2iCV-GaaNniaub386hUWSb5Pg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3183
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3183>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> 2013/4/24 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> >>
> >> btw. has anyone used go with musl?
> >>
> >
> > Go ships its own libc, which I'm fairly certain it depends on.
> 
> lib9, but are you sure about that?
> 
> # ldd /usr/bin/go
> 	linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff50fff000)
> 	libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007ff215e4b000)
> 	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff215abf000)
> 	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff216068000)

Is the go binary written in go? The point was that go links programs
against its own libc, not that the go compiler is linked against its
own libc.

Rich