From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3212 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: idunham@lavabit.com Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: crypto libraries Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:11:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20130426011137.GA8103@Caracal> References: <20130425041553.GA13951@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130426005545.GA7923@Caracal> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366938710 1418 80.91.229.3 (26 Apr 2013 01:11:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:11:50 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3216-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Apr 26 03:11:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UVXCb-0005kL-OQ for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11729 invoked by uid 550); 26 Apr 2013 01:11:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11714 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2013 01:11:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=vqCXk75wvSgyIbkpatdpxzhtqJK2pfhJoCPfh/wdDegd42nWnxYYcmzIjmgmJ3DKvjU78yplF4+Ej0l5ZfwVk88Vl47ioAhbewNr8XSiC6JIVXtR1ed92pCkHMcA3x46FRkI0Qg2bLiwiWTZ4Qjjl/BwwI7aRreZ3ggJqnhd7nI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130426005545.GA7923@Caracal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3212 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:55:45PM -0700, idunham@lavabit.com wrote: > There are at least 6 I can think of off the top of my head > (openssl crypto, gcrypt, nettle, tomcrypt, gpg, openbgp) > and I know that's not even half of them. > Not really an option for regular SSL, I'm afraid. > (just due to the standards, and the need for getting it going...) > But something along the lines of OpenBGP (I think that's the name; it's > a BSD-licensed PGP library) would be one place to start if you wanted > that. > It would be interesting if the library transparently handles both SSL > and something along those lines, so someone gets the certificate p2p > stuff for free by using the library. Sorry, all instances of openbgp should be "netpgp": http://www.netpgp.com/faq.html > Thanks, > Isaac Dunham >