From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3249
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Licensing.
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:47:14 -0400
Message-ID: <20130429224714.GB27641@intma.in>
References: <7DA8A203-CFF2-4559-AA2C-7CF38B5DD28E@palsenberg.com>
 <1367184878.18069.171@driftwood>
 <20130429204731.GZ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <1367269859.8496.15.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367272407 31730 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2013 21:53:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:53:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3253-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Apr 29 23:53:26 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3253-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3253-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UWw0j-0001GE-LR
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:53:25 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 24366 invoked by uid 550); 29 Apr 2013 21:53:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 24355 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2013 21:53:24 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1367269859.8496.15.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3249
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3249>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:10:59PM +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.04.2013, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
> > > Now imagine what lawyers think of programmers' legal theories.
> > 
> > Your analogy would hold more water if the majority of lawyers doing
> > software licenses had any clue about the law, but they don't.
> 
> so the majority of self proclaimed C programmers actually know C ?-)
> 
> Your subsequent mail seems to indicate that there are a lot that don't.
> 
> sorry, seeing your two mails, just one after the other, couldn't
> resist :)

This phenomenon is not limited to C.

khm