From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3600
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Thinking about release
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:50:06 -0400
Message-ID: <20130710075006.GW29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <20130613012517.GA5859@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPfzE3a0h=2NFqgnBqXj3J2q7VgYjqZ19Ab=0LAe5u5SvWXHaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130613014314.GC29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPfzE3aerGrdmTkj15o0CTVtt8TZpTyAnSAj1Joau+Jb_cNGUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130709053711.GO29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPfzE3ZTxynUeJjq7KWijZGhsV==NymW4vqLhnQbEYCXRxVf-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPfzE3ZsMpC9d4VDZyHabhKOffOQW0dnG7Nwpm8EqVBLUXNZKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1373438578.12826.167.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373442621 14395 80.91.229.3 (10 Jul 2013 07:50:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3604-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 10 09:50:23 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3604-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3604-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UwpAL-0006x8-H2
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:50:21 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 17837 invoked by uid 550); 10 Jul 2013 07:50:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 17826 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2013 07:50:19 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1373438578.12826.167.camel@eris.loria.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3600
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3600>

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:42:58AM +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.07.2013, 10:26 +1200 schrieb Andre Renaud:
> > typedef struct multiple_size_t {
> >     size_t d[4];
> > } multiple_size_t;
> 
> why not have it
> 
> typedef size_t _multiple_size[4];
> 
> the wrapping into struct just doesn't serve much purpose, I think.

Because arrays are not assignable.

Rich