From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3601
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: endian.h warnings
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:15:09 +0200
Message-ID: <20130710081508.GH15323@port70.net>
References: <CAPfzE3ZSbwgBi=YLaqJ0qvYYN8Hp9qFiQSx=QGA8MYZqJyYnQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <51DCC6F8.50804@gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373444120 30192 80.91.229.3 (10 Jul 2013 08:15:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3605-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 10 10:15:22 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3605-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3605-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UwpYX-0004O4-Ln
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:15:21 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 3722 invoked by uid 550); 10 Jul 2013 08:15:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 3714 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2013 08:15:20 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51DCC6F8.50804@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3601
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3601>

* Nathan McSween <nwmcsween@gmail.com> [2013-07-09 19:29:12 -0700]:
> anything, struct padding warnings are extremely annoying. Somewhat
> (maybe?) concerning warnings are signed / unsigned comparisons in
> math/*

signed anything is concerning in math

(int arithmetics is used for bit representation manipulation
which should not be done signed, but this is a legacy from
fdlibm that will slowly get fixed)

i don't see signed comparision warnings with gcc,
i see a warning about the long double struct on x86
which is planned to be fixed but i wanted to wait until
i get around doing a larger long double code restructuring