From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3697 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: time code progress Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:35:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20130720013500.GD3249@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20130716194553.GA9438@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130717093325.GA12469@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130720011106.GC15323@port70.net> <20130720012226.GC3249@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130720012913.GD15323@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374284116 28222 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2013 01:35:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:35:16 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3701-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jul 20 03:35:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V0M4o-0002uw-JX for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:35:14 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 19709 invoked by uid 550); 20 Jul 2013 01:35:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 19699 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2013 01:35:13 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130720012913.GD15323@port70.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3697 Archived-At: On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:29:13AM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Rich Felker [2013-07-19 21:22:26 -0400]: > > A conversion is not an overflow. If the actual value does not fit, it > > results in an implementation-defined value (of the destination type) > > you are right > sorry for the noise No problem at all. I was actually very happy to see that somebody is reviewing the time code. :-) Rich