From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3739
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: New "portable" crt1.c
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 03:41:33 -0400
Message-ID: <20130725074133.GF4284@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <20130719021726.GA19068@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <1374737888.3031.10@driftwood>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374738105 2717 80.91.229.3 (25 Jul 2013 07:41:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3743-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jul 25 09:41:47 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3743-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3743-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1V2GBF-0001XR-U6
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:41:46 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 25825 invoked by uid 550); 25 Jul 2013 07:41:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 25817 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2013 07:41:45 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1374737888.3031.10@driftwood>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3739
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3739>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:38:08AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 09:17:26 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >I'm open to comments, but my feeling is that we should keep the
> >existing crt asm for archs where it already exists, but replace the
> >empty crt1.c with a version based on this approach, and encourage
> >using the new approach on all new ports. In the future, if maintaining
> >the current asm becomes a burden (e.g. if new requirements are
> >introduced) we could remove the existing asm and switch to the C for
> >all ports.
> 
> The wiki page on porting to new architectures needs some updating. :)

Well I have to actually finish and add it first.

Rich