From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3897 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: problems with dynamic linking since 0.9.1 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:49:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20130814144955.GJ5368@port70.net> References: <20130813110709.GH5368@port70.net> <20130813145259.GI5368@port70.net> <20130813180331.GE221@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130814142710.GN221@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376491812 14515 80.91.229.3 (14 Aug 2013 14:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:50:12 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3901-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 14 16:50:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V9cOl-0006E4-M9 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:50:07 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3168 invoked by uid 550); 14 Aug 2013 14:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3160 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2013 14:50:07 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130814142710.GN221@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3897 Archived-At: * Rich Felker [2013-08-14 10:27:10 -0400]: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Jens wrote: > > bash-4.1# ld -V > > GNU ld version 2.17 > > Supported emulations: > > elf_x86_64 > > elf_i386 > > i386linux > > > > Hope this helps. > > Thanks. I don't see anything obviously wrong in the trace or verbose > output. Unless /lib is where you have musl installed (which doesn't > seem to be the case, the -L /lib/. probably should not be there, but > it doesn't seem related to the problem. Have you run the file command > and/or readelf -a on libc.so as a sanity check? Perhaps something > about the toolchain or existing wrapper messed up the link of libc.so. > wasn't there an issue that the last gplv2 binutils version failed to produce a working libc.so with -Bsymbolic-functions?