From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3898 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: problems with dynamic linking since 0.9.1 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:51:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20130814145158.GO221@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20130813110709.GH5368@port70.net> <20130813145259.GI5368@port70.net> <20130813180331.GE221@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130814142710.GN221@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130814144955.GJ5368@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376491929 16074 80.91.229.3 (14 Aug 2013 14:52:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:52:09 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3902-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 14 16:52:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V9cQm-0007l3-Jx for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:52:12 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3808 invoked by uid 550); 14 Aug 2013 14:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3800 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2013 14:52:11 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130814144955.GJ5368@port70.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3898 Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:49:55PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Rich Felker [2013-08-14 10:27:10 -0400]: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Jens wrote: > > > bash-4.1# ld -V > > > GNU ld version 2.17 > > > Supported emulations: > > > elf_x86_64 > > > elf_i386 > > > i386linux > > > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Thanks. I don't see anything obviously wrong in the trace or verbose > > output. Unless /lib is where you have musl installed (which doesn't > > seem to be the case, the -L /lib/. probably should not be there, but > > it doesn't seem related to the problem. Have you run the file command > > and/or readelf -a on libc.so as a sanity check? Perhaps something > > about the toolchain or existing wrapper messed up the link of libc.so. > > > > wasn't there an issue that the last gplv2 binutils version > failed to produce a working libc.so with -Bsymbolic-functions? My recollection was that it failed to support -Bsymbolic-functions at all and would produce an error when encountering it, so this makes me wonder how generation of libc.so succeeded at all... Rich