From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4000 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Matias A. Fonzo" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Squirrel - no-bloat scripting language with sane syntax and semantics Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:43:03 -0300 Message-ID: <20130901194303.64e838ce@rafaela> References: <20130824001118.5be5b3d7@x34f> <1377423273.2737.120@driftwood> <20130825170006.4f833b16@rafaela> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378075479 12238 80.91.229.3 (1 Sep 2013 22:44:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: daniel.cegielka@gmail.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4004-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Sep 02 00:44:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VGGNv-000445-8A for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:44:43 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18067 invoked by uid 550); 1 Sep 2013 22:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 4039 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2013 22:25:00 -0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=HIVB5/Rv c=1 sm=1 a=ncIV9/qU51OnLGZmmgjMIg==:17 a=ASokBxPbDM8A:10 a=N71Z3rB378MA:10 a=9Q5qhoxNCncA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=IkK7ewXGAAAA:8 a=q38hP9ykB34A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=XAA0hLUeAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=SszQXPcGWoa4APHm784A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=PSNYSdUADz4A:10 a=PQFK3w8lxOQA:10 a=5bnIr+R+vs56oWgm0tidcA==:117 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.11 X-EN-IMPSID: KyQn1m00D0EKrUA01yQnin In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs39 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-dragora-linux-gnu) X-EN-UserInfo: 437011c531a180990c73778423a05059:b8667caf9a6d463388b687baf7896592 X-EN-AuthUser: selk@mfonzo.powweb.com Original-Sender: "Matias A. Fonzo" X-EN-OrigIP: 190.151.170.177 X-EN-OrigHost: unknown Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4000 Archived-At: Dear Daniel, El Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:39:15 +0200 Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka escribi=C3=B3: > 2013/8/25 Matias A. Fonzo : >=20 > > > > I see only one GNU project which I've added, GNU moe - an > > alternative text editor for GNU nano, Joe, and perhaps others. Is > > this a problem?. > > >=20 > Matias, > Why you recommend moe editor on wiki? moe is written in c++ and > statically linked likely will be bigger than nano. Window splitting ok > but nano has support for syntax highlighting. >=20 I was an user of pico and much later of nano (now GNU nano). One of the main reasons why I decided to use and recommend "moe" instead of "nano" is that something basic like the redo and the undo results in experimental code[1][2]. =46rom the nano ChangeLog: "2009-07-11 Chris Allegretta * nano-regress: Small tweaks * Change undo code to off unless unabled via a command line option (-u/--undo). Until this code stabilizes this is the only responsible way to treat it." [1]http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/nano/ChangeLog?revision=3D4580&= root=3Dnano&view=3Dmarkup "2009.07.28 - GNU nano 2.1.10 "Ellie" is released. This version includes various fixes for portability including some older HP-UX compiler combos, various compiler warnings, and some crash fixes in the undo code. On the topic of the latter item, the undo code is now marked as experimental since it can cause severe stability and memory issues, and thus now requires a flag (-u, --undo) in order to enable it. Please feel free to continue to test the undo code and thanks again for using nano for your text editing needs. Go team Nano!" [2]http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/nano/NEWS?revision=3D4398&root= =3Dnano&view=3Dmarkup It is true that "moe" does not have many features. And I see this lack of features as an advantage, for example I like the fact that moe does not have SIGWINCH (which imply more code) ... Take care, Matias