From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4071
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: GLOB_BRACE
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:38:12 -0400
Message-ID: <20130926183812.GT20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <CAKHv7pi7ZGHZJ_J-+M8mNd-QBJKKRNw3_zB_0SnP5brWj7HfPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130916125049.GG20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAKHv7pgNExd=8fY+_OZP+98+Vn59uo5DODT5i1U5-xVicOKfSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1379945328.1974.50@driftwood>
 <524051AD.8070008@gentoo.org>
 <20130923150323.GH20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAKHv7pjewwgz-Xx8MzKgnX5TaSqXBy9JLwm63DUBgy23n--ndg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5243AB8E.1070706@gentoo.org>
 <20130926182309.GS20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPLrYETu4-tUnRW4rhKVst5Mhbz4sjiCkA-7iRhqgQVR9P3H1g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380220703 10213 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2013 18:38:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:38:23 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4075-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Sep 26 20:38:25 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-4075-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4075-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1VPGSH-0006qq-Ig
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:38:25 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 32064 invoked by uid 550); 26 Sep 2013 18:38:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 32056 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2013 18:38:24 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPLrYETu4-tUnRW4rhKVst5Mhbz4sjiCkA-7iRhqgQVR9P3H1g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4071
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4071>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:30:20PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> 2013/9/26 Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>:
> 
> > It should be noted that runit, and the runit replacements I've seen,
> > are still quite bloated compared to what they actually could/should
> > be, and are probably also lacking in robustness. I see them more as
> > "the right direction" than the end goal.
> >
> > Rich
> 
> And what is your opinion about minit? It's written by runit author (fefe).

I haven't read it, but I've never seen a piece of code by fefe that
had anything resembling robust error handling. (My main experience
reading his code is dietlibc though, so maybe some of his other stuff
is different.)

Rich