From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4156 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [Feature Request] SHA-1 HMAC Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 22:07:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20131026020740.GO20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20131025160006.GL20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <003201ced1c6$560326e0$020974a0$@securivm.ca> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382753272 19669 80.91.229.3 (26 Oct 2013 02:07:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:07:52 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4160-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Oct 26 04:07:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZtI9-0000pb-Ja for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:07:53 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5242 invoked by uid 550); 26 Oct 2013 02:07:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 5231 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2013 02:07:52 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003201ced1c6$560326e0$020974a0$@securivm.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4156 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Alain Toussaint wrote: > > Busybox has a very light, simple implementation you could copy; it's under > GPLv2, but the > > code is by Rob Landley and I imagine he would relicense it under BSD/MIT > for you if you need > > a less restrictive license. The original code it was based on was public > domain, so you could > > also just go back to that. See libbb/hash_md5_sha.c in the Busybox source > for details. > > I don't think it's possible to relicense Busybox as BSD/MIT as it stand but > Rob Landley is working on a replacement toolset to Busybox which is called > toybox and is indeed under a BSD license. I think the relevant code is all his so he could relicense it. Rich