From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4355
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Release test framework
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:01:35 -0500
Message-ID: <20131204060135.GZ24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <20131203221153.GA18502@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAOb3iughuEJ0BGXf5NhfOwPFt8hed9WBQNyUU0YVtTG=n+=G0g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386136902 19794 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2013 06:01:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 06:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4359-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Dec 04 07:01:48 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-4359-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4359-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Vo5Wu-0004ke-GL
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:01:48 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 7694 invoked by uid 550); 4 Dec 2013 06:01:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 7686 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2013 06:01:47 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOb3iughuEJ0BGXf5NhfOwPFt8hed9WBQNyUU0YVtTG=n+=G0g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4355
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4355>

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:51:42PM +0800, 邓尧 wrote:
> If busybox is used, the test framework itself would depend  on musl-libc,
> which means test test framework would depend on the test subject. In
> theory, it's a bad bad idea.
> 
> 0.02$

The busybox used need not even be linked with musl; it could be a
uclibc-linked binary from aboriginal, for example. The point was not
to use busybox as any major part of the test framework, just to have a
shell to run the script that would run all the tests from the
libc-test package inside qemu.

Rich