Re: Re: Last call for bugfixes for 1.0

[Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>]

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 07:28:05PM +0100, Thomas Kreuzer wrote:
> On 16.03.2014 16:25, Rich Felker wrote:
> >Have you done analysis to determine that this has anything to do with
> >musl's fgetln function? Short of that, I suspect it's just an ordinary
> >crash in your fgetln. There's no reason they should be interfering;
> >for static linking, if fgetln is already defined then musl's fgetln.o
> >won't even get linked, and for dynamic linking, your symbol overrides
> >and nothing else accesses musl's fgetln symbol
> 
> As I said, if I just rename the function it works perfectly. But it
> doesn't seem to be a problem of musl either.
> Sorry for making the wrong call, the problem must be somewhere else
> in my tool chain

If you can make a self-contained example to reproduce the problem, I
can take a look at it. Otherwise I don't know what I can do to help
though, and my guess is still that it's not specifically caused my
musl.

Rich