From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4750 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-igbb@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: malloc not behaving well when brk space is limited? Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:54:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20140329205409.GN8221@example.net> References: <20140329170032.GJ8221@example.net> <20140329191502.072c07f9@vostro> <20140329172212.GW26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140329180229.GL8221@example.net> <20140329185619.GX26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140329195422.GM8221@example.net> <20140329202553.GA26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396126478 4807 80.91.229.3 (29 Mar 2014 20:54:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Rich Felker Original-X-From: musl-return-4754-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Mar 29 21:54:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WU0Gu-00034X-Q7 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:54:32 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 19469 invoked by uid 550); 29 Mar 2014 20:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 19461 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2014 20:54:31 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe01.swip.net; client-ip=5.135.215.243; envelope-from=u-igbb@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140329202553.GA26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4750 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 04:25:54PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > I have in mind a solution which may work as a real fix, not just a > workaround. If it works out, it will probably make it into the 1.1.x > series first, but it should apply cleanly to 1.0.0. This sounds great. > I'm pretty busy with some other work right now so it'll be at least > a few days before I really get started on it I think. That's alright. I have got a workaround sufficient to continue the building and testing but I will not commit/publish the built applications yet. When a more tolerable malloc arrives I can rebuild from the beginning and only then commit to production the resulting, proper and reconfigurable incarnation. Nice. Tell me when you might need testing. Thanks Rich! Rune