From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4864 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-igbb@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: if_nameindex/getifaddrs and dhcpcd issue Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20140410073251.GM21662@example.net> References: <20140408111147.5f79729f@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> <20140408152559.124030b1@vostro> <20140408154537.GG26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140408190807.7dc6b184@vostro> <20140408224112.GH26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140409071714.GB21662@example.net> <20140409222041.GK26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397115655 19665 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2014 07:40:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:40:55 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4868-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Apr 10 09:40:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WY9bI-0000y2-Vr for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:40:45 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11372 invoked by uid 550); 10 Apr 2014 07:40:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11361 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2014 07:40:42 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe04.swip.net; client-ip=77.247.181.162; envelope-from=u-igbb@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140409222041.GK26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4864 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:20:41PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Does if_nameindex "work" (modulo the issues with it) on BSD linux > emulation now, and would it fail if we switched to netlink or /proc > based? This is not necessarily a show-stopper but it would be nice if > we had a workaround, and it's something where we should have input > from users running musl binaries on BSD. I'm not aware of which of the binaries may be calling if_nameindex. The ones which are being used continuously are Samba and Coda servers running on FreeBSD (for the sake of ZFS), their current production versions are still linked to uclibc. Occationally I run "everything" i.e. a whole user environment in the form of Linux binaries on NetBSD but it will take some time before this happens and I test if_nameindex there. Rune