From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5194 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-igbb@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: RFC 3484 goals: partial or full coverage? Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 10:15:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20140603081558.GL31947@example.net> References: <20140603032909.GA4505@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401783386 23210 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2014 08:16:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:16:26 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5199-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jun 03 10:16:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WrjtL-0004p1-At for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:16:19 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 4028 invoked by uid 550); 3 Jun 2014 08:16:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 4020 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2014 08:16:17 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe05.swip.net; client-ip=77.247.181.162; envelope-from=u-igbb@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140603032909.GA4505@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5194 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:29:09PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Ideally I'd like to avoid adding more than ~500 bytes of code size to > libc (and static binaries using it) to make this stuff work, and I > certainly don't want to add runtime costs that are unreasonable to > many users. But choosing whether to return v4 or v6 results first > (this is one of the most visible effects of the whole procedure) seems > pretty important from a sense of not pessimizing systems that have > both v4 and v6 but where using one is much worse than the other. +1 Rune