From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Mutt group reply
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:58:59 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140713205859.GA25416@openwall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C2D6F8.2040908@skarnet.org>
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 13/07/2014 17:34, Solar Designer wrote:
>
> >An alternative is to reconfigure the list so that it doesn't set the
> >Reply-To header, but this may result in many replies being inadvertently
> >sent off-list. I think it's better for Mutt users to adopt a habit to
> >answer that question with "n".
>
> Even better: configure Mutt to use Mail-Followup-To.
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
>
> Mutt supports it, it just needs to be configured via an option. I can't
> remember the details because it's been a long time, but back when I was
> using Mutt, I did that for all the mailing-lists I was subscribed to, and
> it worked flawlessly.
This suggestion keeps coming up, but I think it's a solution to a
different problem. The mailing list sets Reply-To to keep discussions
on the list regardless of what MUA people are using. When the mailing
list is configured that way, Mutt exhibits the behavior with group
replies that I have mentioned, and the workaround is either to answer
"n" to the question or to set the reply_to option differently:
reply_to
Type: quadoption
Default: ask-yes
If set, Mutt will ask you if you want to use the address listed
in the Reply-To: header field when replying to a message. If
you answer no, it will use the address in the From: header field
instead. This option is useful for reading a mailing list that
sets the Reply-To: header field to the list address and you want
to send a private message to the author of a message.
This problem and the workaround apply even if the mailing list in
question is configured in Mutt as such, in which case Mutt would set
Mail-Followup-To on your messages, but that's irrelevant.
If I understand correctly, Mail-Followup-To reduces occurrences of
duplicate replies to you, but it does not prevent missed group replies
from you to off-list message senders when the list sets Reply-To.
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-13 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-13 16:34 Solar Designer
2014-07-13 17:48 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2014-07-13 18:59 ` Laurent Bercot
2014-07-13 20:58 ` Solar Designer [this message]
2014-07-14 3:51 ` Rich Felker
2014-07-15 12:20 ` Rich Felker
2014-07-15 14:27 ` Rob Landley
2014-07-15 15:12 ` Rich Felker
2014-07-16 3:39 ` Rob Landley
2014-07-17 5:48 ` Felix Fietkau
2014-07-17 6:03 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140713205859.GA25416@openwall.com \
--to=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).