mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@gmail.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: More MIPS stat.h breakage...?
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 04:40:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140716114005.GB2021@newbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140716041556.GA26058@brightrain.aerifal.cx>

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:15:56AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> I thought all of these issues were addressed a long time ago, but I
> think we still may have at least one bits-header bug on MIPS big
> endian: stat.h. The kernel version of this structure has:
> 
> struct stat64 {
>         unsigned long   st_dev;
>         unsigned long   st_pad0[3];     /* Reserved for st_dev expansion  */
>         ...
> 
> whereas st_dev needs to be dev_t, which is 64-bit.
> 
> We're handling this now simply by using the following definition:
> 
> struct stat
> {
>         dev_t st_dev;
>         long __st_padding1[2];
>         ...
> 
> i.e. incorporating one of the padding slots into st_dev. But this only
> yields the correct value for little endian. For big endian, I think
> device numbers are appearing in the upper 32 bits rather than the
> lower ones. This renders the major, minor, etc. macros incorrect.
> 
> I think the cleanest fix for this is probably to add an arch-specific,
> nop-by-default function __stat_fixup or similar that gets called
> whenever any stat-family syscall succeeds in order to patch up the
> results as needed. Alternatively, we clould do the patchup at the
> syscall level for mips' syscall_arch.h, much like how x32 works.
> 
> Anyone have strong opinions on how this should be handled?

I seem to remember some comment about trying to work on kernels that predate
stat64().  __stat_fixup would be a logical way to handle that, should that
still be intended.
The most precise information I can find is that stat64() dates to 2.4.18;
I'm not sure about the accuracy of that.

But I don't have a strong opinion; I just noticed a similarity to an idea
that was mentioned some time back.
Also, I'm not aware of any reasons 2.4.1x might be a major target
for musl. ;-)

Thanks,
Isaac Dunham


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-16 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-16  4:15 Rich Felker
2014-07-16 11:40 ` Isaac Dunham [this message]
2014-07-16 14:41   ` Rich Felker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140716114005.GB2021@newbook \
    --to=ibid.ag@gmail.com \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).